The USA incredible $800 low value / duty free threshold is increasingly being viewed as a significant trade loophole that circumvent customs rules and duties. While supporters point out how the $800 de minimus rules have benefitted consumers, others simply see them as a way around tariffs, sanctions, and port fees.

Disclaimer: The information in all Jet Worldwide online content, including this post, is for general information only and is not intended to, constitute legal and/or tax advice.All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this site are hereby expressly disclaimed. The content on this posting is provided “as is”; no representations are made that the content is error-free.

A brief history of Section 321

The U.S. allows for goods valued at $800 or less to enter into the U.S. duty-free, as outlined in Section 321 of the 2015 Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act. The implications of $800 threshold (from $200) were likely not fully understood when the act was passed.

Section 321, 19 USC 1321 is the section of the trade act that provides for the admission of articles free of duty imported by one person on one day not exceeding $800.

section 321 versus section 301 JetworldwideSee below discussion of Section 301 tariffs versus Section 321 Entries

Section 321 for imports from China

The trade war between the United States and China have been has subjected certain imports from China under “301 China” or “Section 301” to US-specific import duties. Interestingly, Section 321 overrides Section 301 as long as the items being shipped meet the de minimus value.

Beware of fraudulent practices and USPS labels.

De minimis explained

Global customs processes traditional included low value thresholds -or de minimus - levels whereby the administrative cost of processing outweighed the benefits gained from duty collection. This worked well in an era of large freight shipments and niche "express consignment" sub category. But now, such low value shipments (i.e. online orders and individual parcels) have come to dominate supply chains.

The term de minimus has evolved to the mean the value of each online order that can be imported duty free.

Editors note: What is the correct spelling, de Minimis (with an i ) --or--versus de minimus (with a u)? US customs regulations spell the term with an "i" while spell check recommends using a "u"...? We use both interchangeably (we are transportation experts but not great writers!).

Jet Worldwide provides North American global logistics. Our support refers to the various systems facilitating the international movement of goods. By not being beholden to a specific carrier or process, your team gains valuable industry insights.

digital-signature-parcel-1920x620READ MORE: UNDERSTANDING IMPORT DUTY

Millions of Duty Free Entries Per Day to the USA

The growth of duty free entries, or e-commerce shipped direct to the USA has exploded. Estimates vary but the number of e-commerce parcel imported duty free is expected to exceed 10 million packages per day in 2022 with reports of year over year volumes quadrupling!

Section 321 Manifest Submission Versus Type 86

Traditionally, section 321 was viewed primarily as a "manifest submission" more than a traditional customs entry. Via traditional processes, a section 321 does not require and HS Code. A description, for example of a shoe could be a sneaker, wearing apparel, a brake shoe, auto part, camera shoe, or electronic accessory.... and maybe more.


  • The advantage to e-commerce shippers of not having to assign an HS Code is offset by ambiguity and challenges the review processes for regulatory compliance, data collection and oversight by other government agencies (PGA's).
  • Type 86 Entry - rather than being a consolidated entry - requires an entry li for every item that facilitates automated process coordinated with the customs brokerage systems.
No matter which Section 321 method is chosen, we are advising shippers and importers to be provide as much detail as possible for the product description and to gain a deeper understanding of HS Codes.


Express Consignment: The starting point for parcel clearance

To assist with the clearance of small parcels, and at the behest of FedEx and UPS, a specific section of the regulations (CFR Part 128) was carved out to assist the clearance through express facilities.

Express consignment facilities (ECCF's) used to be the only way to take advantage of high volume parcel imports via section 321 along with consolidated informal entries. However, express facilities are restricted primarily to the large carriers and a select few Express Consignment Operators.

Express processes were largely a success in that they mandated "integrated control," a set additional requirements on express operators, and a per parcel (per HAWB) charge to reimburse customs for the cost of providing express clearance.


ECCF to CFS: Free and (almost) Express clearance for e-commerce imports

ECCF's are difficult to obtain and expensive to operate. While customs tried to increase express consignment fees, they also - at the same time - granted no charge express clearance capabilities to Cargo Freight Stations (CFS). CFS facilities often literally share the same warehouse as an ECCF with a physical barrier/ fence separating the two.

  • Goods consigned the express facility are charged $1.11 per shipment for the privilege of express clearance and either pre-cleared or cleared within hours of fight arrival.
  • Goods consigned to the cargo/CFS facility are usually cleared in 24 to 72 hours without a per shipment customs fee.

Warehouse manager checking her inventory in a large warehouse-1

From the Express environment to regular brokerage

As most customs brokers did not have access to efficient section 321 processes, and likely due to lobbying by interested parties, customs expanded access to section 321 entries via their Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). These entries are referred to as Type 86.

Via ABI Type 86 informal entries, duty free section 321 parcel clearance is available across all ports and modes of transport - most notably ocean. Type 86 ABI entries make it possible to import tens of thousands of individual e-commerce orders in ocean containers duty free on a single entry.


Countries and duty free thresholds

Canada and Mexico

The concept of de minimus levels is a key topic in trade discussions and free trade agreements. Under the new NAFTA /USMCA, for example, Mexico agreed to raise its de minimus level from $50 to $100. For Canada, the amount of duty-free shipments from the USA increased to 150 Canadian dollars and a limit for tax-free shipments will be CA$40. Both were previously CA$20.

de minimus values compared e-commerce

Rest of the World: Duty Free but with a duty to pay VAT

Major importing countries (including Europe, UK, Australia) the focus has shifted to maintaining duty free thresholds (although most are far less than $800 US) but with value added tax for all imports.

jet-VAT-vector imageCountries with a national tax regiment - often referred to as value added tax - mandate collection of value add tax which is often around 20%.

Online platforms and online sellers are responsible for collecting sales tax for shipments to Europe and the UK.



The Future of Section 321 in the USA

The concern from many, including the House Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee Chairman Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., is that millions of packages per day are being imported and "nobody's monitoring it." US customs recognizes the need to better controls for such things as intellectual property, counterfeits and drugs. The concern includes goods imported via the postal system (which are historically have ben subject to less oversight than commercial shipments). Read about changes proposed by lawmakers in January 2022.

The concern for intellectual property abuses is heightened by the fact that over 80% of Section 321 imports are for online orders from China.

See legislative proposal

section 321 versus section 301 JetworldwideSECTION 301 VERSUS SECTION 321

Section 301 imports are those that are subject to higher tariffs and restriction and imposed by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). This power was used extensively by the Trump administration against imports from China. However, goods properly entered under Section 321 are not subject to Section 301 duties and restrictions.

Unintended Consequence of duties imposed on Chinese goods: The Chinese government responded to higher section 301 tariff by reducing export tariffs for e-commerce orders and shippers diverted their logistics processes take advantage of duty free Section 321.

Regulatory remedies being discussed for section 321

This policy changes under discussion regarding section 321 include;

  • Reducing the de minimus level from $800
  • Requiring e-commerce shippers to register as the importer of record
  • Denying Section 321 import of products other restricted or subject to Section 301.
  • Not allowing Section 321 entry for import of online orders


Web Only retailers from China: Shein Case and Point

Shein is the biggest web-only fashion brand in the world and upending fast fashion, challenging retailers Zara and H&M. They are a great example of how to best profit from section 321 duty free thresholds.

Shein combines technical savvy and parcel logistics: The virtual shopping mall ships directly to their American customers from their Chinese warehouses. They are the low costs leader thanks to Chinese manufacturing, no stores, no ocean container delays, no American warehousing, and... duty free import!

Shipping from Asia via the USA

Section 321 entry processes has enabled shipping from Asia to international destinations via the USA. The simplified duty free import processes have enabled shippers from Asia to ship goods from Asia to American receiving hubs from where the goods are exported.

American Companies benefiting from Section 321

Beyond the benefit to American consumers, section 321 has been a great benefit for the air freight industry (notably FedEx and UPS), Amazon, eBay, brokerage firms and facilities specializing in express clearance. Many of these firms lobbied for the increase in low value threshold (from $200 to $800) and will likely be able to minimize the likelihood of wholesale changes.



The issue of low value thresholds is now an important part of free trade negotiations. On the flip side of imports benefitting American consumers, international orders for American retailers and business are growing faster than the domestic market.

  • Trade discussions with China, for example, now include raising their de minimus level which is now less than $10.
  • There is renewed discussion on rejoining the trans-Atlantic trade agreement, CPTPP

We continue to recommend multiple import processes and believe that section 321 processes will continue to be an important of global logistics strategies.


Comments since we published this blog include:

  • "You should not use the term 'circumvent' for shippers and importers are following the regulations around section 321 with no intent to circumvent other regulations."
  • "This is good for consumers and should continue."
  • "The processes should be lauded for their facilitating this new category but some additional controls are probably a good thing.
  • "The best solution is to bring shippers into compliance by making them the importer of record."


contact jetship

Disclaimer: This post and all Jet Worldwide online content is for general information only .

Written by Timothy Byrnes

Disclaimer: The information in all Jet Worldwide online content is for general information only and is not intended to, constitute legal and/or tax advice. All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this site are hereby expressly disclaimed. The content on this posting is provided “as is”; no representations are made that the content is error-free.

Clause de non-responsabilité: Les informations contenues dans tout le contenu en ligne de Jet Worldwide sont uniquement à titre d'information générale et ne sont pas destinées à constituer des conseils juridiques et/ou fiscaux. L’information contenue notre contenu en ligne est à titre indicatif seulement. Toute responsabilité concernant les actions prises ou non sur la base du contenu de ce site est expressément déclinée. Le contenu de cette publication est fourni « tel quel » ; aucune représentation n'est faite que le contenu est sans erreur.