There has been a seismic shift in U.S. trade policy. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the President the authority to impose tariffs. In the world of cross-border logistics, this means sweeping changes for importers, customs brokers, and shippers relying on international trade lanes.
The government moved swiftly to fill the gap. Beginning February 24, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will stop collecting IEEPA duties as those tariff codes go inactive. In their place, the Administration has pivoted to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Executive Summary:
Expect new tariffs via Sections 301 (Unfair trade) and 232 (National Security)
IEEPA was designed as an emergency economic sanctions authority, allowing the U.S. President to regulate commerce after declaring a national emergency regarding foreign threats. It was traditionally used for sanctions, asset freezes, and specific entity restrictions.
The Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA was never written as a broad tariff statute. Using it to bypass Congress violated the separation of powers. As a result, all broad-based tariffs implemented strictly under IEEPA are now invalid.
Within hours of the Court decision, the White House announced a global import surcharge using Section 122. This tool acts as a short-term bridge rather than a permanent framework.
This policy direction delivers a major structural signal to the logistics industry: postal and commercial duty treatments are on a clear path toward total alignment.
Beginning February 24, postal shipments will also face the new surcharge. The current Qualified Party model will continue to manage duty collection and remittance to CBP. The surcharge remains until the 150-day window closes or a brand-new postal entry process goes live. This closes the gap between traditional freight and e-commerce postal channels.
Not all tariffs were struck down. Statutes explicitly delegated by Congress remain completely intact. Understanding these distinct legal lanes is vital for accurate customs declarations.
| Authority | Trigger | Status |
|---|---|---|
| IEEPA | National emergency statute | Struck down by Supreme Court |
| Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974) | Unfair trade practices (e.g., China tariffs) | Active and unchanged |
| Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act of 1962) | National security threats (e.g., steel, aluminum) | Active and unchanged |
Note: The de minimis ban remains in place alongside Section 301 and Section 232 tariffs.
The transition from IEEPA to Section 122 officially begins at midnight on February 23 into February 24. CBP has confirmed they are reviewing the ruling and will issue ACE filer guidance shortly (CSMS #67823350). In the meantime, customs experts suggest the following actions:
While the Supreme Court ruling removes one layer of tariff policy, the rapid implementation of Section 122 proves that trade volatility continues. Relying on an experienced logistics partner to navigate these structural changes is more critical than ever.
Our cross-border experts are tracking every regulatory update to keep your supply chain moving.
Contact Our Logistics Team